My book in progress develops an Argument from Revelation over six chapters (and counting…ugh). A couple chapters establish that the Bible describes God in a way that precisely fits claims made about God in natural theology—not just the conclusions, but the premises, at a fine-grained level of detail.

A second section essentially exhibits the plausibility of the Bible, essentially retelling the story and showing that it constitutes an expression of the words and actions of God that we might antecedently expect, not just because they fit the presuppositions of natural theology, but because they make a consistent, coherent, and rational system. Good students of the Bible understand how the Bible *really does sound* like it was written by God.