I’m gonna have to disagree with Greg regarding U.S. support of Ukraine. We plowed billions of dollars into a deeply corrupt regime, one at the center of global corruption in which the Biden family itself had their fingers. It always did smell to high heaven.

And we did not have the money; we went into more debt, which constituted a tax on all U.S. citizens. At the same time we were sending more billions to Ukraine, we let the people of the flood-ravaged South suffer without help. And it made no difference to the outcome.

Meanwhile, we must properly count the human cost of war, which is horrific and easy to lose sight of if your country is not the one in the war.

Russia has taken back what was, not that long ago, Russian territory (i.e., from before the Soviet Union), and the majority of which is Russian-speaking. As long as they don’t continue on their march, and are willing to accept a cease-fire, this is by far the best expectable outcome.

But how far should we go back in history to decide where the border should be? Soviet Union was much bigger. Ukraine has been an independent country for how long? As for the language point, English comes to mind. I respectfully disagree that this is a valid point for Russia to keep what they have taken by force. Also do we know if those Russian-speaking people in the territory taken by Russia really want to be Russian? I understand this is a very complicated issue and feel for people who are suffering in the war or because of flood. I agree that US should take care of their own citizens first and is right in trying to stop the war. But I take issues with how President Trump and his administration are handling this negotiation. I think US is better than what they are representing.

You are not currently signed in. Please sign in or use the link below (requires minifeed.org).
Like a post to share the love.
Log in Sign up
Reply to join the conversation.
Log in Sign up